Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Base release use case
Is this Knowledge Base change safe to promote?
AWS gives you a Knowledge Base and a sync API. It does not give you a release process. BedrockOps runs the candidate and the live Knowledge Base against the same probe set, records the promotion, and keeps the rollback path open.
Trial is $0 for 7 days through AWS Marketplace. Connect with a read-only cross-account IAM role.
A retrieval change looks fine in a notebook, and nobody wants to promote it on that evidence.
Release management for RAG, not another retrieval dashboard.
Candidate versus live
Both Knowledge Bases answer the same probe set, so the comparison is like for like.
Audit-logged promotion
Every promotion records the owner, the timestamp and the comparison evidence.
Rollback path
The previous Knowledge Base stays available, so a bad promotion is reversible.
Isolation checks
Tenant isolation probes run against the candidate before it serves real users.
- Retrieval hit rate, 640 probes0.847
- Zero-result rate1.9%
- Tenant isolation probes240 / 240
- Ingestion failures0
From candidate Knowledge Base to a recorded, reversible promotion.
- The team builds a candidate Knowledge Base with the new chunking, embedding or rerank configuration.
- BedrockOps runs the same probe set against the candidate and the live Knowledge Base.
- Retrieval-quality scores, zero-result rate and tenant isolation results are compared side by side.
- Promotion is recorded with an owner and the evidence, and the previous Knowledge Base stays available for rollback.
A Knowledge Base change that can be defended and undone.
Put a release process around your Bedrock Knowledge Bases
Start in AWS Marketplace, connect AWS with a read-only role, and compare candidate Knowledge Bases against live retrieval behaviour.